The recruitment process is lengthy - over 6 meetings and 4 hours take-home assessment - and have unrealistic expectations from the candidate even for a senior engineering position. The assessment is said to be considering "great ux as much as good code", but is reviewed by engineers only (??).

The interview process began with an initial introduction from the HR representative. They provided an overview of the company and the role and asked general questions about my background and experience. Next, I moved on to the technical portion of the interview, where I was tasked with refactoring some TypeScript code using common design patterns. Unfortunately, the live coding editor didn't support TypeScript, which resulted in many errors and noise during the session. Despite this, I tried my best to showcase my knowledge of design patterns and my problem-solving skills. After the technical portion of the interview, I received feedback from the interviewer. They mentioned that they were impressed with my understanding of design patterns, but unfortunately, they were looking for someone with more experience in Java, which is not my case. However, the interviewer asked me to keep in touch with the company for future positions, indicating that they were still interested in my qualifications. Overall, it was a challenging but informative experience, and I appreciated the opportunity to showcase my skills and learn more about the company and the role.