Their interview was more like a "non-interview": rudimentary simplistic questions (what dates did you work on project [X] that's on your resume? vs discuss one of your projects), clearly uniniterested or uncurious interviewers, it seemed like they had decided on a candidate but still were required to interview me or more people. No case study or research problem to work on, no presentation required, their conversation was interrupted and tedious. I guess they had somebody in mind to hire but company policy (and employment law) requires considering multiple candidates, and diverse, so they went through the motions with me (I'm "diverse" according to legal definitions, so I guess I was their token diversity candidate to "interview" and reject just for show, and to avoid legal action). So, beware, Zillow could care less about innovation and promoting user experience, they might be just hiring from within or a specific friend of a friend from their clan, then interviewing new "candidates" to comply with the law.