Short supplement to an already disappointing litany of negative feedback, which the company does not seem to care to respond to (red flag). Interview process was short and efficient; a call followed up with technical interview onsite. Mixed impressions of interviewers being nice and somewhat arrogant at the same time. Questions fairly easy, related to data structures, distributed systems, and telemetry, among others. Not always clear what the interviewer is looking to learn. Two interviewers, of whom the more senior did not always seem fully aware of the correct answer to the questions they asked (his comments got corrected once or twice by the more junior one). At the end, visibly annoyed with insufficient answers, commenting in a fairly rude and unprofessional manner. No useful feedback after interviews. (No feedback at all, in fact.) Overall, impression of fair technical grasp but lack of maturity in working with people. Asked about the reasons for recent substantial cuts in staff, explained that they "hired the wrong people". This matches the otherwise quite explicitly admitted tendency to allocate blame to others instead of self-reflection and leading by positive example. (Hired 50 wrong people? Really? Perhaps you're doing it wrong, Numbrs?) No offer received, which spared me from rejecting them myself.