The overall impression, as well as the impression from each stage of the recruitment process, was very positive. First of all, I received a clear, understandable, and transparent invitation to the interview from Skaistė Marija. The meeting was scheduled immediately. The next step — and one that remained present throughout the whole process — was my conversation with Razmik. I remember it very fondly, which doesn’t mean it lacked challenging questions that required me to pause and think carefully. At the end of that call, I was offered two options for the technical task. I chose the “home assignment.” After completing it, I received detailed and constructive feedback — both pros and cons — followed by an interview with the technical team. The task itself gave me a lot of freedom in architectural decisions, and the interview felt like a thorough and professional code review. Afterwards, I once again received feedback from Razmik and was invited to meet the team I would be working with. That meeting was very satisfying — everyone was clearly focused on teamwork and open communication. The feedback I received right after was quick and positive. The offer followed just as swiftly, and so now I’m happily looking forward to finalizing the contract :-) Honestly, I can’t find any negatives, but if I really have to mention one — there was a brief issue with the meeting link, which Skaistė Marija resolved immediately :-) This was the best recruitment process I’ve experienced so far, though undoubtedly demanding and challenging (which, in fact, is a plus).