Pregunta de entrevista de Meta

Given an array, print the largest subarray that has elements in an increasing order

Respuestas de entrevistas

Anónimo

27 de ago de 2009

Algorithm: Lets say the input array is: 1 2 3 -4 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1. Start with the first element and keep on increasing the count and index till you hit an element that is less than the previous element. In the above case -4 < 3, hence count =3, so store it in maxCount and LastIndex = index + 1 - count So, until this point 1 2 3 is the largest subarray. 2. Again start from -4, with index = 3 and count = 0 and keep on increasing the index and count till you hit an element which is less than the previous element. Here 0 < 9, hence you stop and compare the new count with the maxCount to see which is greater. Similarly, keep on following this till you hit the end of the array. Complexity - O(n)

7

Anónimo

29 de ene de 2013

We only need the longest contiguous subsequence, so it can be done in linear time like in Sid's solution.

1

Anónimo

13 de dic de 2016

This is dynamic programming

Anónimo

11 de nov de 2009

Sid's solution is not for longest increasing subsequence problem the best answer would be O(nlgn)

4

Anónimo

16 de may de 2012

B: really?, it has an O(n) solution. def conseq(arr): cur_start,cur_end,cur_size=0,0,1 max_start,max_end,max_size=0,0,0 n=len(arr) if n==0: return (0,0,0) for i in range(1,n): if arr[i]>arr[i-1]: cur_size+=1 cur_end=i else: cur_start=i cur_end=i cur_size=1 if cur_size> max_size: max_size=cur_size max_start=cur_start max_end=cur_end return (max_size,max_start,max_end)

Anónimo

9 de ene de 2013

All the above answers are incorrect except the one that pointed out it's an instance of Longest Increasing Subsequence. The standard dynamic programming algorithm is O(n^2). There is a more complex solution that runs in O(n lg n). Google for the answers.

Anónimo

17 de nov de 2010

Classic NP problem. No easy solution for this. Time complexity could be very high

Anónimo

17 de jun de 2009

Pretty easy really