first stage discussion on my previous project experiences, and interviewer's explanation of project work
second stage discussion on project work again, second stage interviewer sounded less experienced in the area compared to the first stage interviewer. feedback was pointless and mostly irrelevant...interviewers have very limited experience, and more advanced aspects of the work seems to go over their heads.
Me postulé en línea. Acudí a una entrevista en Expedia Group (Londres, Inglaterra) en feb 2026
Entrevista
First technical assessment: 75 min for Hackerrank generated questions, related to business scenarios that Expedia normally would encounter. multiple SQL Qs + 2 Python Qs + Basic 101 Stats (p-value, type 1, type 2 error, CI)
Me postulé en línea. El proceso tomó 2 meses. Acudí a una entrevista en Expedia Group (Bengaluru) en feb 2026
Entrevista
The interview experience was positive overall. The interviewers were understanding, supportive, and created a comfortable environment for me to share my thinking. The questions were thoughtful and relevant to the role. However, the process was significantly slower than expected — there were long gaps between rounds with little proactive communication, and I had to follow up multiple times to get updates on next steps. Faster communication between stages would greatly improve the candidate experience.
Technical phone screen and then 4 rounds of interviews that covered machine learning, coding, and soft skills. They let me know they were not going to make an offer several weeks after the interview.