Interview process was mostly remote. I got to meet with many different people on the team, including C-Level folks and by and large have great conversations. (They felt like conversations, not interrogations). They seemed passionate about their work and interested in finding out what I was looking for and making sure there was a culture fit. I loved this part of the process, even though it was a bit lengthy. (I think I had about 6 or 7 interviews over the period of a month?) 2 issues: 1) The technical interview was pretty bad. Literally puzzle questions (think FizzBuzz) in an environment without access to any reference material, docs, etc and then your general software trivia questions. 2) After the end of the process they decided to go with another candidate, which is totally okay. But they also delayed decision-making without letting me know what was going on and then ghosted without any feedback or response beyond their one sentence letting me know they went with someone else. I understand this is relatively standard these days, but my feeling is that if you go all the way through an interview process with a team, have hours and hours of conversation, and make it to the final stages, they should offer some feedback on why they decided another candidate would be a better fit.