Short screen call with a recruiter, followed by another screen call with the hiring manager, then an onsite day with several team members. The entire process took about two weeks. The good: If you've interviewed with some of the bigger brands in the valley then you know that some of them have real jerks on staff. Square did not look like that at all - I interviewed with some of the nicest people you can probably find in SV and I'm happy to recommend interviewing with Square in that respect. I also have several friends who work there and had similarly good things to say. The hiring manager seemed to be junior but with a good attitude. The bad: The interview process was confused and misaligned and the recruiter took zero accountability for it. I applied for a new product role and the title was changed from product to engineer halfway through the hiring process, after the onsite interviews had already been scheduled. I actually only learned about this by accident and was not notified by the recruiter. The two roles are just vastly different. The recruiter assured me it was semantics so I gave the company the benefit of the doubt and interviewed anyway but it was a mistake. I felt uncomfortable discovering in the interviews that my concern was real and the team had little interest in my more recent work experience, and basically suffered a misunderstanding of what I was told I was interviewing for. That part was just unprofessional and probably cost me the option to interview for a different role I would actually be a good fit for. The ugly: The recruiter just didn't take any accountability for the confusion. The feedback that got from the team through the recruiter also demonstrated that nobody bothered to clear up the confusion afterwards and the confusion was pinned on me with no clarifications from the hiring manager. While the interview process was not as unpleasant as with other companies, it still ended up being just as ridiculous. I'm crossing Square off my list for future role. No thank you.