Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Atlassian

      Empleador activo

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de Atlassian | Empleos en Atlassian | Sueldos en Atlassian | Prestaciones en Atlassian
      Entrevistas en AtlassianEntrevistas para el cargo de Senior Backend Engineer en AtlassianEntrevista en Atlassian


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista para Senior Backend Engineer

      28 de oct de 2020
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sídney
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista fácil

      Solicitud

      Me postulé en línea. El proceso tomó 6 meses. Acudí a una entrevista en Atlassian (Sídney) en abr 2020

      Entrevista

      The interview started with an HR brief, followed by pair programming (2 sessions, 1 hour each), followed by systems design(virtual whiteboard session 1hr), followed by culture interview(1hr), then manager interviews (2 rounds, 1hr each). 6 hours in total. I was put on hold because they couldn't find a team that matches my skillset. 6 months later, came the official rejection letter.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Implement rate limiter and vote counter in any language.
      Responder pregunta

      Otras evaluaciones sobre las entrevistas para el cargo de Senior Backend Engineer en Atlassian

      Entrevista para Senior Backend Engineer

      26 de ago de 2024
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Melbourne
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia positiva
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en Atlassian (Melbourne)

      Entrevista

      Simple interview asked to design and code a rate limit algorithm followed by a whiteboard session to describe a url shortner given a long url design a serivce to shorten the url. The interviewers were helpful had a great experience.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Design and code Rate limit algorithm
      Responder pregunta
      1

      Entrevista para Senior Backend Engineer

      16 de may de 2023
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en Atlassian

      Entrevista

      Round 1 - Code Design Interviewer gave introduction and directly jumped onto the question without bothering to ask for a introduction from me as if they are in hurry. The solution was implemented end to end following TDD. A right approach to TDD is to start with minimal testable code and then cover all the test inputs, eventually do refactoring, but interviewer expects a TDD where you know the solution first, so annoying. It’s was a 1 hour in total with 45 min given to the coding (hard limit). It will not look as pair programming and candidate might feel disconnected from the interviewer as they seem to be in hurry so be cautious to ask the interview that what all things he want us to cover. Overall uncomfortable interview and contradictory feedback as later discussed with the recruiter. Round 2 - Data Structure Again interviewer gave introduction and jumped to the question. Not bothered to ask the candidates introduction and do an ice breaker. Solution was approached the same way as first one and got a great feedback. Points to be noted: - Both rounds were to implement solution to a code algo/problem statement and follow TDD - Both solutions were approached in the same way following TDD best practices and all the edge cases were covered. It is at interviewer’s discretion that what feedback they want to provide and yes everyone has his opinion. - Candidate might not feel connected to the interviewer rather you will feel more like streaming a twitch session for your viewers - Despite following the similar approach to the solution you may get different and opposite feedback. Things you are expected to do and even I was doing Language proficiency, Decision making, Communication, Code readability and documentation however again interviewer might give you an opposite feedback and you could sense it during the session itself.

      Preguntas de entrevista [2]

      Pregunta 1

      Code Design - Rate limiter
      Responder pregunta

      Pregunta 2

      Data structure - ranked voting system
      Responder pregunta
      1

      Entrevista para Senior Backend Engineer

      1 de jun de 2023
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia neutra
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Me postulé a través de una recomendación de un empleado. Acudí a una entrevista en Atlassian en abr 2023

      Entrevista

      Referred through a friend into this role. Approached by a recruiter who explained the interview process to me in detail. it's quite helpful, although I can feel that he is reading a paragraph from their internal process. First round was 2 back to back interviews of coding proficiency, 1 hour each with 45 minutes of coding and 15 min of questions. The challenges are not too hard, but they want your code to be expandable. The leetcode sections for Atlassian are not helpful to be honest as they kept changing requirements which is expected for interview at this level. A day after coding interview, recruiter reached back saying I have passed it and went through the feedbacks from previous sessions. Not too far-away from my feeling, however some of the comments are a bit nitpicking in my opinion. Also the recruiter mentioned what to prepare for the systems design interview. Again, quite detailed, precompiled infokit for them it seems. However the system design introduction during this call is not quite same from the real experience I had later. Then I booked the systems design in the following week. The interview have 2 people interviewing me, one is the main interviewer and another is listening / shadowing(?). In the system design they end up with asking (in my opinion) very unimportant details about system, which in turn, wasted the time for dive in details for the actual systems. Eventually it took them another 2 days to come up to the conclusion and rejected me after the system interview. The recruiter replied and promised me to a feedback session. However, he ghosted me after I provided my availabilities. My takeaway is that the interviewer needed to be guided - they expect you to provide improvements by yourself, but sometimes I tried to provision improvements, they don't want me to follow that path (I have been turn down for considering improvements twice during interviews) I don't want to be bitter about the result as this outcome is what I expected anyway. However, I do believe there's room for improvements here, as it's a senior role and the questions should be more focused on what a senior role should do in their day to day job, specifically on the system design part of the interview, which I have wrote in detail below.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      (Used Python for coding interviews) 1. Coding: design a rate limiter. This part was easy - I had experience with writing ethernet switch controllers in the past so I just wrote a quick token bucket to solve it. I have wrote the testcases before hand with doctest and quickly expanded the system into a rate limiter object that can create/update bucket and bucket size, which is a added-on challenge for the task. I have offered to make it aware of customer but they don't want me to extend it. I have provided my code to the interviewer. Feedback: I can't remember it clearly but the interviewer did pointed out something that I can improve. Maybe Horizontally scalable? Rate limiter is an interest topic and there's a lot of places to improve and they should start a topic to ask for. 2. Coding: count votes. This is a question tagged "Atlassian" on leetcode, but the question is vastly different. So leetcode isn't helping here. The question is to design a system to count votes from ballots, and with maximum 3 candidates per ballot, return the winning candidate by points. First place candidate win 3 points, and last place candidate win 1 point. Question updated: tie breaking strategy. They want to do the tie-breaking so that the first one wins the max point wins. I suggested that in this case the tally need to run at least twice as I need to know the max point first as well as the time-series data, and expanded to multiple methods in the object to deal the tie-breaking strategy. I implemented it, however for some reason the python interpreter refuse to print the correct value even though I have traced the correct result being stored in the array from the debugger. In the end the interviewer, to my surprise, take that as the correct result. Feedback: I was quite anxious due to lack of sleep and anxiety of preparing the interview. On top of that the minor glitch on the printing results prevented me to print the result correctly. I think I was borderline rejected but somehow I got to the next round. 3. System design: building a tagging system This question is quite common in it's kind. I tried to answer it from the perspective of a normal scalable serverless web-application, with APIGW + Lambda + DynamoDB as this was what I am good at and I can talk about scalability, availability and operation excellence perspectives. But instead, the interviewer asked me to instead of providing an API prototype as a language function, they want me to come up with detailed design of a RESTful API. I have wrote all the APIs required in this action, with GET/POST/DELETE/PATCH actions together with url endpoints, payload, url semantics and URL-attributes. That along took more than 15 minutes, and totally they only got 40 minutes to discuss about the rest of the architecture. I did, however, tried to squeeze as much as possible about scalability of APIGW, Lambda, partition key selection and sharding in DynamoDB and discussed the key selections for different tables, like partition / sort / global secondary keys, as well as adaptive partition limits for dynamodb.
      Responder pregunta
      9