Stage 1. Call with Recruiter (one of the best, and probably the only good part in the whole process) Stage 2. Technical OA, medium/easy LC Qs on linked list and string array manipulation Stage 3. Virtual onsite (4 rounds) -- 1 interviewer who is not in the interviewing team. (Amazon LP and one easy sorting hits Q) -- System Design on Messenger (interviewer checked out after screen share did not work in Amazon chime. I used a notepad and pen. Later found out that browser needs to allow screen recording , which was not allowed by default in my new system). -- Behavioral round with manager on Amazon LP Qs and one long Q with a simple solution on OOP. The interviewer just copy pasted it and told me to read it and solve when only 15mins was left. -- one medium LC question (I used backtracking, interviewer was not impressed because I did not use Trie) 2/4 interviewers were one of the worst that I have ever been to because one was disrespectful, said "nice story" to my project experience which I was passionate about and had put a lot of hard work on. The other one had terrible audibility because of an accent like a bullet train and low mic quality, I had to ask several times to repeat, also dismissive behavior about all the working solutions I provided (DFS, BFS, backtracking). Giving this a neutral experience still because it seems to be a team specific behavior, and I think I could have still done better. Use the interview window to make sure you don't land in a toxic team.