Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Utility Warehouse

      Empleador activo

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de Utility Warehouse | Empleos en Utility Warehouse | Sueldos en Utility Warehouse | Prestaciones en Utility Warehouse
      Entrevistas en Utility WarehouseEntrevistas para el cargo de Software Engineer (Golang) en Utility WarehouseEntrevista en Utility Warehouse


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Indeed, Inc. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Indeed, Inc.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista para Software Engineer (Golang)

      26 de jun de 2026
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en Utility Warehouse

      Entrevista

      Easily the worst interview process I have been through. It started positively, with a technical chat and competency-based questions involving both the recruiter and hiring manager. They explained how the team works, the technology they use, and the direction they want to take the product in. At that stage, the role and the engineering environment sounded genuinely interesting. After that, however, communication became very poor. I did not hear anything for weeks until I reached out myself. I was repeatedly told that the process would move faster, and I received several apologies about how slow things had been. I was then progressed to the next stage, which involved both a system design interview with two engineers and a live coding problem. This was a two-hour interview completed in one session, with no option to split the stages across different days. I had previously been assured that I did not need to worry about not being fully familiar with Go, and that I could use Java for the coding interview. During the interview, the engineers said they wished they had been told this beforehand and apologised again for the lack of communication. To their credit, both the coding interview and system design discussion went well, and the feedback I received was very positive. However, the following week I again had to keep reaching out to understand where I stood in the process. I was eventually told there would be another interview and that someone would be in contact to arrange availability. I am still waiting for that communication. At this point, the process has taken around three months and still appears to be ongoing. While the product and technology stack looked interesting, the lack of organisation and poor communication throughout the hiring process has completely put me off. My time is also valuable, and candidates should not have to repeatedly chase for basic updates.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      How would you define a good outcome of a feature not through code
      Responder pregunta
      avatar
      Respuesta de Utility Warehouse
      4d
      Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed and constructive feedback about your interview experience. First and foremost, we want to sincerely apologise for the extended timeline and the gaps in communication you experienced. A three-month process is not the standard we aim for, and we fully recognise that your time and effort deserve better. During the course of your interviews, we experienced changes in team ownership and internal hiring coordination that affected continuity across the process. While this provides context, it does not excuse the delays or the lack of clear communication you experienced. We also identified a misalignment internally regarding the programming language expectations for the technical stage, and we regret that this created unnecessary pressure during your live coding session. While we are glad to hear that you found the product interesting and had positive interactions with our engineering team, the overall experience you describe fell short of the standard we expect to provide. We are reviewing our interview ownership, interviewer alignment, and scheduling processes to improve accountability and ensure candidates receive a more consistent and timely experience. Thank you again for your honesty and for the time you invested in speaking with us. While we missed the mark with you, your review is directly shaping a better experience for future software engineers. If you are open to it, we would love the chance to connect with you directly to provide proper closure on your application and listen to any further insights you might have. Please feel free to reach out to Martyna at mzbyszewska@uw.co.uk or myself Ketna kramchandani@uw.co.uk